Focus on Critical Risk Areas
But what sets CTEM apart, and more importantly, how does it transcend the existing landscape of Vulnerability Management?
At the core of CTEM lies the ability to unearth tangible, actionable threats to vital assets. While anyone can identify security gaps within an organization’s ecosystem, the real challenge lies in sifting through the deluge of vulnerabilities and discerning which ones pose the gravest risks to critical assets.
In our assessment, a CTEM initiative empowers you to:
- Pinpoint your most vulnerable assets and envisage potential attacker strategies
- Gauge the severity and likelihood of potential breaches
- Prioritize the most pressing risks and vulnerabilities
- Receive practical guidance on how to address them
- Continuously monitor your security stance and gauge progress
With CTEM, you gain insight into attackers’ perspectives, correlating weaknesses within your environment with their exploitability. The outcome? A prioritized roadmap of vulnerabilities to address, including those which can be deferred safely.
Rather than a mere product or service, CTEM embodies a structured approach aimed at curtailing cybersecurity exposures through five pivotal stages:
- Scoping – Understanding the scope of the CTEM initiative entails aligning with business priorities and discerning potential impacts on critical operations.
- Discovery – Delving into asset discovery extends beyond identifying vulnerabilities to encompass misconfigurations, security control lapses, and other weaknesses that could be leveraged by attackers.
- Prioritization – The goal here isn’t to remediate every identified issue or chase elusive zero-day threats but to focus on mitigating the threats most likely to be exploited.
- Validation – This phase involves validating the exploitability of identified exposures and assessing the effectiveness of existing monitoring and control systems.
- Mobilization – Acknowledging that remediation can’t be fully automated, this step aims to operationalize CTEM findings by streamlining approval processes and enhancing cross-team collaboration.
CTEM versus Alternative Approaches#
While several alternative approaches to bolstering security posture exist, each has its limitations:
- Vulnerability Management/RBVM (Risk-Based Vulnerability Management) prioritizes vulnerability remediation based on predefined severity scores, often leading to backlog issues and overlooking non-vulnerability weaknesses like misconfigurations.
- Red Team exercises and Penetration Testing offer valuable insights but are constrained by their manual nature and point-in-time assessments, potentially missing ongoing vulnerabilities.
- Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) focuses solely on cloud environments, neglecting on-premises assets and inter-cloud risk interactions.
In contrast, CTEM offers distinct advantages:
- Comprehensive coverage across all asset types, including cloud, on-premises, and remote, with a focus on critical assets.
- Continuous discovery of various exposures, including CVEs, misconfigurations, and identity issues.
- Real-world insights into attacker perspectives, facilitating targeted remediation efforts.
- Prioritization of remediation based on potential impact and feasibility.
- Actionable guidance for sustained improvements.
The Value of CTEM
CTEM presents a paradigm shift in risk management, offering tangible benefits over traditional approaches:
- Swift reduction of overall risk exposure.
- Maximization of remediation impact, potentially freeing up resources.
- Enhanced collaboration between security and IT teams.
- Establishment of a cohesive risk language, driving continuous improvement.
Getting Started with CTEM
As CTEM is a methodology rather than a singular solution, initiating the process entails a holistic approach:
- Securing organizational buy-in as the first crucial step.
- Deploying appropriate software components to support data collection and process automation.
- Defining critical assets and streamlining remediation workflows.
- Orchestrating seamless system integrations.
- Establishing executive reporting mechanisms to track security posture enhancements.
In our assessment, embracing a CTEM program fosters a shared risk lexicon between Security and IT teams, enabling focused remediation efforts on the handful of vulnerabilities that pose genuine threats amidst the myriad exposures.
By Andrej Kovacevic
Updated on 14th July 2024